![]() ![]() We will take advantage of the way that Python permits sequence types to liveĭouble lives as boolean values. In order to handle this with as few changes as possible to our present program, ![]() the player has not collided with anything and robots is empty – the.the player has collided with something – the robots win.robots is not empty and the player has not collided with anything.That is why the variable in the play_game function that catches What should we return? In its current state, check_collisions is aīoolean function that returns true when the player has collided with somethingĪnd lost the game, and false when the player has not lost and the game shouldĬontinue. Robot collisions and removing dead robots by adding: This can be done in check_collisions immediately after we finish checking Simply check whether robots is empty to determine whether or not the player The robot list will be empty when it no longer contains live robots, we can Since the player wins when all the robots die, and The next loop traverses backward over the robots list removing all the robots Robot2 from the game by first removing its shape from the graphics windowĪnd then removing it from the robots list. Junk.append(place_robot(robot1, robot1, True)), and then remove Part of the structured programming process.Īfter robot1 is marked as junk, we add a pile of junk to the junk list at Stepwise refinement of both program data and logic is a normal It is not at all unusual for data structures to change as program development # robots.py # from gasp import * SCREEN_WIDTH = 640 SCREEN_HEIGHT = 480 GRID_WIDTH = SCREEN_WIDTH / 10 - 1 GRID_HEIGHT = SCREEN_HEIGHT / 10 - 1 def place_player (): x = random. ![]() A previously computed value that is stored for This isĪn inefficient solution to the problem, and it gets far worse as the argumentĪ good solution is to keep track of values that have already been computed by In turn,įibonacci with n = 3 calls fibonacci with n = 2 and n = 1.Ĭount how many times fibonacci(0) and fibonacci(1) are called. With n = 4 calls fibonacci with n = 3 and n = 2. To understand why, consider this call graph for fibonacci withĪ call graph shows a set function frames, with lines connecting each frame to Of our machines, fibonacci(20) finishes instantly, fibonacci(30) takesĪbout a second, and fibonacci(40) takes roughly forever. Furthermore, the run time increases very quickly. Might have noticed that the bigger the argument you provide, the longer theįunction takes to run. If you played around with the fibonacci function from the last chapter, you ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |